S v shackell 2001 4 sa 1 sca
http://www.saflii.info/za/cases/ZAECMHC/2024/29.pdf Spletevidence. He refers to a decision of the South African Supreme Court of Appeal in S v Shackell 2001 (4) SA 1 (SCA) para 30, where that Court reiterated the trite principle of …
S v shackell 2001 4 sa 1 sca
Did you know?
Splet2001 (1) SA 817 (C) at 820I—821B and Blanchard, Krasner & French v Evans 2001 (4) SA 86 (W), [2001] 2 All SA 450 at 89H—90A (SA), 453a—c (All SA). In the court a quo, however, Van Zyl J had considered himself bound by a statement in Purser v Sales; Purser & another v Sales & another 2001 (3) SA 445 (SCA), [2001] 1 All SA 25 para 12 at ... Splet01. jan. 2006 · We then proceed to discuss each of the four components of the right to just administrative action: the constitutional rights to lawful, procedurally fair, and reasonable administrative action, as...
Splet[2006] 4 All SA 515 (SCA); 2005 JDR 1438 (SCA) Issue: Access in foreign country. Senior Family Advocate, Cape Town and another v Houtman. Reference: [2006] JOL 16644 (C); … http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2016/26.html
SpletThis being a first appeal this court has a duty to make a complete and comprehensive appreciation of all vital features of the case, and to scrutinize the evidence on record with … SpletS v Malgas 2001 (1) SAR 469 (SCA) S v Karolia 2006 (2) SACR 75 (SCA) S v Mthimkulu 2013 (2) SACR 89 (SCA) 8. Appeals and reviews Chapters 30 and 31 of the CPA (sections 302-324) (i) the difference between appeals and reviews (ii) powers of the court on appeal and review R v Dhlumayo 1948 (2) SA 677 (A) at 705-706 S v Rabie 1975 (4) SA 855 (A)
Splet2001 (1) SA 817 (C) at 820I—821B and Blanchard, Krasner & French v Evans 2001 (4) SA 86 (W), [2001] 2 All SA 450 at 89H—90A (SA), 453a—c (All SA). In the court a quo, however, …
SpletS v Goosen 1989 (4) SA 1013 (A) ... S v Joshua 2003 (1) SACR 1 (SCA) Facts: Some young men stole accused’s wife’s purse. She thought she knew who had taken her money and so Joshua took his shotgun and went to find the men. He saw a gang and confronted them, accusing them of taking his wife’s purse. The gang members denied stealing the ... leafly therapySpletSee also Sager v Smith 2001 (3) SA 1004 (SCA); Shackell 2001 (2) SACR 185 (SCA). A relationship with one or other of the parties to a case also affords grounds for recusal, by … leafly trainingSpletSouth African law reports 2001 (4) October : S v Shackell 2001 (4) SA 1 (SCA) - Recusal of presiding officer - improbabilities in the accused's version. Authors : Templeton, K A. Journal Title : Judicial Officer. Citation : (2002) 5 (1) Judicial Officer 18. S.A. Cases Cited : S v Shackell 2001 (4) SA 1 (SCA) leafly the bad companyhttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2011/171media.pdf leafly the mint mesaSpletS v Molimi 2006 (2) SACR 8 (SCA) X1, X2 and Z were co-conspirators to a planned robbery of a big retail store (Clicks) in a shopping mall. X (store manager) informed X2 about exact time at which a security guard (employed by Fidelity Guards) would arrive at store to collect money. ... S v Burger 1975 (4) SA 877 (A) Appellant and R assaulted ... leafly testingSpletS v Dlamini [1] [2] [3] was a South African court case. The central question was of duplication of convictions. The accused had been charged with and convicted on three counts of robbery. He was one of three perpetrators, one of whom was armed and had threatened a group of three women. The robbers had taken the women's property and … leafly towson mdSplet18. mar. 2016 · THE STATE RESPONDENT. Neutral Citation: Pillay v The State (453/2015) [2016] ZASCA 26 (18 March 2016) Coram: Tshiqi, Petse and Zondi JJA. Heard: 24 February 2016. Delivered: 18 March 2016. Summary: Criminal law and procedure - Assessment of evidence – trial court’s failure to evaluate evidence of a child witness who is also a single … leafly testing by state